RE: inverse masks

From: OhioHondo (ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 09:17:14 GMT-3


I believe the calculation below yields 150 not 151. It is an exclusive OR
calculation. All 1's should equal a 0.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Herve Bruyere
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 5:05 AM
To: eric
Cc: Ccielab
Subject: Re: inverse masks

OK, so:

   1 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
   3 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
   5 = 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
147 = 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
----------------------
       X 0 0 X 0 X X 1 = 10010111 = 151

and the result is 201.201.1.0 0.0.151.0

regards
rv

eric wrote:
> Sorry guys,
> I should have been more clear
> ie.....
> allow
> 201.201.1.0, 201.201.3.0, 201.201.5.0, 201.201.147.0
> do this with a minimum of lines.
> now I know that 201.201.1.0 0.0.151.0 works. ( It also allows others which
> is fine ).
> What I am trying to get my mind around is how to do it on the fly so to
> speak. with enough time and a couple of routers I can muddle my way thru.
>
> I understand the care and dont care bits part, " Its in relation to what"
> that I am confused with. I know its not that hard and yet..........
>
> regards,
>
> ~e
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> eric
> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 4:55 PM
> To: Ccielab
> Subject: inverse masks
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anybody have a formula or a shortcut that will help me get these.
> I dont know why I cant seem to get my mind around it. I just end up
> confusing myself with the ORed results. It cant be as hard and as
confusing
> as I am making it out to be.
>
> Regards,
>
> ~e



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:36 GMT-3