From: Jonathan V Hays (jhays@jtan.com)
Date: Sat Mar 08 2003 - 16:09:46 GMT-3
Brian,
A big public THANKS!! to you for all the clear, insightful posts.
You've said before that you teach classes. Could you provide more
information on the services you offer? Your http://www.labforge.com URL
seems to go directly to a login page with no links to information. And
if you feel it is not appropriate to post your offering on groupstudy
please email me directly.
Thanks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf Of Brian Dennis
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 1:26 PM
> To: 'stefan vogt'; ccielab@groupstudy.com; 'Peter'
> Subject: RE: Re: atm ilmi-pvc-discovery
>
>
> Stefan,
> You have it right. The "atm ilmi-pvc-discovery" command with
> the "subinterface" option is used to automatically map the
> PVC to a subinterface and isn't intended to be removed. In
> your case you discovered the 9/120 PVC and the command
> automatically assigned it to the .9 subinterface (VPI =
> subinterface #).
>
> Your issue is something different. The PVC (VPI/VCI) was
> assigned to a multipoint subinterface which means a method to
> "map" layer 3 (IP
> address) to layer 2 (ATM VPI/VCI) is needed. You could use
> InARP or manually map the layer 3 address to the layer 2
> address. If a point-to-point subinterface was used no mapping
> would be needed as all layer 3 addresses are "mapped" to the
> one layer 2 address.
>
> As a side note when using this command in the real world I've
> always used it with point-to-point subinterfaces.
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial/Security)
> brian@labforge.com http://www.labforge.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:35 GMT-3