From: Peter (peter@cyscoexpert.com)
Date: Sun Mar 09 2003 - 10:52:25 GMT-3
Brian,
I agree.
But since his subinterface was multipoint you have to create a PVC under it
and either map or inarp. However you cannot create a PVC under subinterface
if you don't remove discovery from major interface. If you try and later
type "show run" it won't be there.
So depending on the exercise requirements you keep the discovery on
point-to-point subinterface or just discover the PVC and statically map
after.
_____________________________
Peter
#7247 (R&S, Security)
CyscoExpert Corp.
4433 W. Touhy Ave. Suite 410
Lincolnwood, IL 60712
Phone (847) 674-3392
Toll Free (866) CyscoXP (297-2697)
Fax (847) 674-2625
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Dennis" <brian@labforge.com>
To: "'stefan vogt'" <stefan-uwe_vogt@web.de>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>;
"'Peter'" <peter@cyscoexpert.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 12:26 PM
Subject: RE: Re: atm ilmi-pvc-discovery
> Stefan,
> You have it right. The "atm ilmi-pvc-discovery" command with the
> "subinterface" option is used to automatically map the PVC to a
> subinterface and isn't intended to be removed. In your case you
> discovered the 9/120 PVC and the command automatically assigned it to
> the .9 subinterface (VPI = subinterface #).
>
> Your issue is something different. The PVC (VPI/VCI) was assigned to a
> multipoint subinterface which means a method to "map" layer 3 (IP
> address) to layer 2 (ATM VPI/VCI) is needed. You could use InARP or
> manually map the layer 3 address to the layer 2 address. If a
> point-to-point subinterface was used no mapping would be needed as all
> layer 3 addresses are "mapped" to the one layer 2 address.
>
> As a side note when using this command in the real world I've always
> used it with point-to-point subinterfaces.
>
> Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP Dial/Security)
> brian@labforge.com
> http://www.labforge.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> stefan vogt
> Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 7:19 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; Peter
> Subject: Re: Re: atm ilmi-pvc-discovery
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> Thanks for your answer - seems I got the purpose of atm
> ilmi-pvc-discovery completely wrong.
> Just to confirm, you are saying that atm ilmi-pvc-discovery is just to
> discover the vpi/vci pair and not for permanent use in a running config?
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
>
> "Peter" <peter@cyscoexpert.com> schrieb am 08.03.03 13:54:02:
> >
> > After discovering PVC remember the VPI/VCI pair, go ahead and remove
> "atm
> > ilmi-pvc-discovery subinterface" command from the major interface, go
> back
> > to the subinterface and create the PVC you just discovered with "pvc
> > VPI/VCI" and type "inarp 1" under it. You should be able to ping the
> remote
> > side now.
> > After all the exercise was to discover the PVC.
> >
> > _____________________________
> > Peter
> > #7247 (R&S, Security)
> > CyscoExpert Corp.
> > 4433 W. Touhy Ave. Suite 410
> > Lincolnwood, IL 60712
> > Phone (847) 674-3392
> > Toll Free (866) CyscoXP (297-2697)
> > Fax (847) 674-2625
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "stefan vogt" <stefan-uwe_vogt@web.de>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 5:50 AM
> > Subject: atm ilmi-pvc-discovery
> >
> >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > Just playing around with atm ilmi-pvc-discovery.
> > > My config looks like this:
> > > interface atm 2/0
> > > pvc 0/16 ilmi
> > > exit
> > > atm ilmi-pvc-discovery subinterface
> > > exit
> > > !
> > > interface atm 2/0.9 multipoint
> > > ip address 172.16.10.6 255.255.255.0
> > >
> > > This one looks good:
> > > r#sh atm vc
> > > VCD / Peak
> Avg/Min
> > Burst
> > > Interface Name VPI VCI Type Encaps Kbps Kbps
> > Cells Sts
> > > 2/0 4 0 16 PVC ILMI 155000
> > UP
> > > 2/0.9 11 9 120 PVC-D SNAP 155000
> > UP
> > >
> > > But ping to remote router fails. When doing debug ip packet:
> > > 17:05:27: IP: s=172.16.10.6 (local), d=172.16.10.7 (ATM2/0.9), len
> 100,
> > sending
> > > 17:05:27: IP: s=172.16.10.6 (local), d=172.16.10.7 (ATM2/0.9), len
> 100,
> > encapsul
> > > ation failed.
> > >
> > > So I assume there is some mapping for the remote ip address missing.
> I
> > searched CCO, but found no hint how to do this when using atm
> > ilmi-pvc-discovery...
> > >
> > > Any input is welcome.
> > > -Stefan
> > >
> > >
> >
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____
> > __
> > > Den Komfort von WEB.DE FreeMail nutzen, aber die alten
> E-Mail-Adressen
> > nicht
> > > aufgeben? Kein Problem: http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021128
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ______
> E-Mails sehen immer gleich aus? Aber nicht bei WEB.DE FreeMail!
> http://freemail.web.de/features?mc=021138
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Apr 05 2003 - 08:51:35 GMT-3