From: Ong Boon Hui (ongbh@cet.st.com.sg)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 22:44:29 GMT-3
Hi,
Do you guys think that besides the two solutions proposed, would you add
spanning-tree rootguard as well ?
Debarros
----- Original Message -----
From: "Krucker, Louis" <louis.krucker@sunrise.net>
To: "'David Terry (ETL) '" <David.Terry@etl.ericsson.se>; "''Tran Tien
Phong' '" <PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:56 AM
Subject: RE: Root switch
> In the case the switch MUST be always root switch
>
> - spanning-tree vlan 11 priority 0
>
>
> cheers
> Louis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Terry (ETL)
> To: 'Tran Tien Phong'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 26.02.2003 14:37
> Subject: RE: Root switch
>
> Hi Phong,
>
> I personally would use "spanning-tree vlan 11 root primary" as long as
> you "fully" meet the requirement that is the main objective. Normally
> the clue is in the question.
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tran Tien Phong [mailto:PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN]
> Sent: 26 February 2003 11:52
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Root switch
>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> If the question asks me to configure the switch as root switch for vlan
> 11, which of the below commands should be used?
> - spanning-tree vlan 11 priority 0
> - spanning-tree vlan 11 root primary
> Both of them will work well but which one do you prefer?
> Thanks
> Phong
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:37 GMT-3