From: Voss, David (dvoss@heidrick.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 03:27:02 GMT-3
Root guard doesn't really apply unless to the setting of root discussion.
By adding it, you have to know exactly why it's required and that it is
asked for. It's main purpose is not to ensure that you stay root, but to
make sure that others do not become root.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ong Boon Hui [mailto:ongbh@cet.st.com.sg]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Krucker, Louis; 'David Terry (ETL) '; ''Tran Tien Phong' ';
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Root switch
Hi,
Do you guys think that besides the two solutions proposed, would you add
spanning-tree rootguard as well ?
Debarros
----- Original Message -----
From: "Krucker, Louis" <louis.krucker@sunrise.net>
To: "'David Terry (ETL) '" <David.Terry@etl.ericsson.se>; "''Tran Tien
Phong' '" <PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:56 AM
Subject: RE: Root switch
> In the case the switch MUST be always root switch
>
> - spanning-tree vlan 11 priority 0
>
>
> cheers
> Louis
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Terry (ETL)
> To: 'Tran Tien Phong'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 26.02.2003 14:37
> Subject: RE: Root switch
>
> Hi Phong,
>
> I personally would use "spanning-tree vlan 11 root primary" as long as
> you "fully" meet the requirement that is the main objective. Normally
> the clue is in the question.
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tran Tien Phong [mailto:PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN]
> Sent: 26 February 2003 11:52
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Root switch
>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> If the question asks me to configure the switch as root switch for vlan
> 11, which of the below commands should be used?
> - spanning-tree vlan 11 priority 0
> - spanning-tree vlan 11 root primary
> Both of them will work well but which one do you prefer?
> Thanks
> Phong
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:37 GMT-3