From: tan (tan@dia.janis.or.jp)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 21:24:18 GMT-3
To me, if the instructions say a router is to "run" ripv1 or v2, I interpret
this to mean the version type under router rip is exactly that, but you are
free to do whatever you want with send/receive version under interface. If
the instructions say "use" or "send" or "receive" rip v1 or v2, then I would
focus larger and go from there rather than cut straight to the above rule.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Casey, Paul (6822)
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 1:01 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Small Question.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> In the CCIE Lab, if per chance say you were as to do a rip_v1 / ospf
> redistribution and you had a class full boundary,
> Could you, instead of using are range/summary address under
> ospf, use the
> ip rip send/ receive interface configuration command on rip
> routers, under
> the interface configuration.
> Technically are you not still running rip v_1 as you have
> not typed version
> 2 under router rip, or are you...???
>
> Or do you need to stick with ospf range/summary commands...etc.
>
> Kind regards.
> Paul.
>
>
>
> **************************************************************
> **************************
>
> This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files
> transmitted with it are confidential and may also be
> privileged and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination,
> distribution or copying
> of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited.
> If you have
> received the E-mail in error please notify postmaster@O2.com or
> telephone ++ 353 1 6095000.
>
> **************************************************************
> ***************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:37 GMT-3