From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 20:21:04 GMT-3
You are correct that Mobile IP has nothing to do with the R&S exam, but
LAM does.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:25 PM
To: ccie2be@nyc.rr.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Amazing but true
My best guess is answer number 2. NOBODY CARES. The reason for that is
Mobile IP is not very important part of the exam. Local Area Mobility
(LAM) is an important part of the exam. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 2:50 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: Amazing but true
Hi everyone,
Over the past few weeks, several times I've posted a question regarding
the two types of care-of-addresses used with Mobile IP. My question
concerned what detemines which type of address is used and whether the
type used is something that's configured on the router or determined by
some other means
- perhaps the software installed on the mobile client.
What surprises me though is that there hasn't been one single response!
I don't understand how that could be. I've searched thru both the Group
Study archieves and Cisco's documentation and found nothing addressing
this question. I also know that mobile IP is fair game for the lab, so
I'm amazed that this question continues to go unanswered.
And, though I can't understand why that is I've come up with 2 theories:
a) nobody knows
b) nobody cares
I can't imagine that nobody on groupstudy knows this - this is probably
the most knowledgable group of networking professional in the world - so
let's nix that idea.
Could it be that nobody cares? That's also hard to imagine. Everyday,
questions seemingly far more esoteric are posted and responded to.
Besides, there must be at least a few people who might need to implement
Mobile IP in the near future and they would certainly need to know about
this. And, even if nobody at the moment needed to know about this for
work, most people on group study seemed to be very intellectually
curious So, let's nix this theory as well.
Well, I hope this sparks some discussion, and maybe, in the process,
generates the answer to the original question.
What do you think?
Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:37 GMT-3