From: kasturi cisco (kasturi_cisco@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 13:58:17 GMT-3
Yes as i see it. To get to 192.168.100 its not suffcient to get thru OSPF
as u are configuring BGP.so the next hop must be R1 the Route reflector.
so set the next-hop self.
Good Luck,[IMAGE]
Kasturi.
>From: "Jung, Jin" >Reply-To: "Jung, Jin" >To: >Subject: BGP
next-hop-self, >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:50:48 -0500 > >I have the
following, > >AS 100 >R1, R2, R3, > >AS 200 >R4, R5 > >R1-R4 is EBGP peer
> >R2 is setup as route-reflector for R1 and R3, > >I have OSPF area 0
enable in all routes, and can reach all the interfaces. >No sync on all
BGP routers > >Question, >I have route 192.168.100.0/24 from R5, >All the
BGP router has BGP route for 192.168.100.0 >But R1 and R3 has next-hop
address to R4 as best path,, >I guess this only happens in the lab, but
since R1 and R3 has the path to >get back to R4 via OSPF, this work fine
without putting next-hop-self >command in R1 to get back to R4,, > >So If
this was real lab, Do I still put "next-hop-self" on R1 even though I
>have best path in the routing table? > >Jin jung...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:37 GMT-3