From: Tim Fletcher (tim@fletchmail.net)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 15:13:06 GMT-3
But isn't that the purpose of the native vlan?
At 07:15 PM 2/26/2003 +0200, Khalid A. Kaseb wrote:
>This is for untagged traffic which sourced by the PC
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Tim Fletcher
>Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:57 PM
>To: Ong Boon Hui; Cezar Fistik; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: voice vlans correct configuration
>
>What's the purpose of the "switchport access vlan 10"? Since it's in
>trunk
>mode that should be irrelevant (but harmless).
>
>-Tim Fletcher
>
>At 12:02 PM 2/26/2003 +0800, Ong Boon Hui wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >How about the following: -
> >
> >Inferface fa 0/1
> >switchport access vlan 10
> >switchport trunk native vlan 10
> >switchport voice vlan 100
> >switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> >switchport mode trunk
> >
> >
> >Debarros
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Cezar Fistik" <cfistik@moldovacc.md>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:57 AM
> >Subject: voice vlans correct configuration
> >
> >
> > > Hi group,
> > >
> > > Could you please, share your ideas about the following
>configurations.
> >Just
> > > assume that an ip phone is connected to int fast 0/10 and to the
>phone is
> > > connected a pc that is supposed to be in vlan 10
> > >
> > > 1.
> > > mls qos
> > > !
> > > interface fastethernet 0/10
> > > switchport mode access
> > > switchport access vlan 10
> > > switchport voice vlan 100
> > > mls qos trust cos
> > >
> > > 2.
> > > mls qos
> > > !
> > > interface fastethernet 0/10
> > > switchport mode trunk
> > > switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
> > > switchport voice vlan 100
> > > mls qos trust cos
> > >
> > > Which one do you think is correct? Or if they are both incorect I'll
> > > appreciate any advice.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Cezar Fistik
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:36 GMT-3