From: Khalid A. Kaseb (khalid_ameen@rayaintegration.com)
Date: Wed Feb 26 2003 - 11:00:26 GMT-3
I believe that the S.H. will cause a problems if you deal with hub and
spoke topology it should be disabled on the hub router ..... correct me
if I am wrong ?!
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Maisano [mailto:FrankM@netarch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:47 PM
To: 'Khalid A. Kaseb '; ''Paul Chen' '; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com '
Subject: RE: Interfaces are all pingable
Extended ping is a great idea. Another thing to keep in mind is that
'pingable' now does not mean it will be later on. In NMC-1 bootcamp
there
was a senario where split-horizion came into play on a physical frame
interface. If you pinged before all the problems surfaced, it looked
like
it was working. Later on, though, if you tried to ping, it would fail.
Another thought (my opinion here) is in reference to optimal path. Due
to
multiple mutual redistribution points, you can be pinging an interface
but
you are taking a path that requires 5 hops when the interface you are
trying
to reach is only 2 hops away. Watch out for this one if you have RIP
and
OSPF as an example.
Check this document: A Scenario with Multiple Redistribution Points
http://www.netmasterclass.net/site/lib.php
-FM
-----Original Message-----
From: Khalid A. Kaseb
To: 'Paul Chen'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 2/26/2003 2:04 AM
Subject: RE: Interfaces are all pingable
You were trying to use extended ping using source interface as Ethernet
or loopbacks ? may be you are able to ping all the interfaces from the
router itself and not able to ping if you used extended ping? Is that
what happened to you ?!
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Chen
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:08 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Interfaces are all pingable
Hi Everyone,
I have just failed my 2nd lab attempt.
I was just wondering if anyone has had the frustrating experience of
having all the interfaces pingable in the lab exam and only getting 50%
of the credit for the IGP protocols section.
I finished the lab an hour early, checked my work to ensure that all
interfaces are reachable including the loopbacks (that was the lab
requirement ).
It is really frustrating and discouraging to find out that you failed
after you made thorough checks amd you were so sure you would pass
because you got everything working.
I must be missing out on something, perhaps I did not answer the
questions in the manner Cisco expected me to ? It is so frustating not
to know what I did incorrectly. The questions were sometimes seems vague
and the proctor does not necessarily want to make it clearer.
Is there anyone out there that shares the same experiences and
sentiments ?
Regards,
Paul
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:36 GMT-3