From: Geoff Zinderdine (d.zinderdine@rogers.com)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 20:56:27 GMT-3
See Table B-2 at this link:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/appxb_rg.htm
The comments that you find scattered over CCO refer to old code. All four
encapsulation types are supported now on all media.
HTH,
Geoff Zinderdine
CCIE #10410
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger McNeace" <rmcneace@terremark.com>
To: "'Tim Fletcher'" <tim@fletchmail.net>; "Voss, David"
<dvoss@heidrick.com>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:41 PM
Subject: RE: DLSW FST
Does this mean we can ignore FST and Direct encap and all the other TR
related topicson DLSW?
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Fletcher [mailto:tim@fletchmail.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Voss, David; ccielab
Subject: Re: DLSW FST
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid30
"FST is supported only when the end systems reside on Token Ring."
-Tim Fletcher
At 08:24 AM 2/19/2003 -0600, Voss, David wrote:
>I've read in Solie's book that FST works with Token Ring only. I don't
>believe this is true. I believe the 3 options for our use in the lab exam
>(with no Token Ring on it) are:
>
>dlsw lite (llc2)
>fst
>tcp
>
>Can anyone confirm fst please and that Solie is, in fact, incorrect?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:31 GMT-3