RE: DLSW FST

From: Roger McNeace (rmcneace@terremark.com)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 16:41:42 GMT-3

• Next message: Ram Shummoogum: "Re: FD with EIGRP"
• Previous message: McCallum, Robert: "RE: OT: Plaques"
• Maybe in reply to: Voss, David: "DLSW FST"
• Next in thread: Geoff Zinderdine: "Re: DLSW FST"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Does this mean we can ignore FST and Direct encap and all the other TR
related topicson DLSW?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Fletcher [mailto:tim@fletchmail.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Voss, David; ccielab
Subject: Re: DLSW FST

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid30

"FST is supported only when the end systems reside on Token Ring."

-Tim Fletcher

At 08:24 AM 2/19/2003 -0600, Voss, David wrote:
>I've read in Solie's book that FST works with Token Ring only. I don't
>believe this is true. I believe the 3 options for our use in the lab exam
>(with no Token Ring on it) are:
>
>dlsw lite (llc2)
>fst
>tcp
>
>Can anyone confirm fst please and that Solie is, in fact, incorrect?

• Next message: Ram Shummoogum: "Re: FD with EIGRP"
• Previous message: McCallum, Robert: "RE: OT: Plaques"
• Maybe in reply to: Voss, David: "DLSW FST"
• Next in thread: Geoff Zinderdine: "Re: DLSW FST"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:31 GMT-3