RE: 3550 no NAT?

From: Kip Palmer (kip.palmer@verizon.net)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 19:01:39 GMT-3

• Next message: Tom Larus: "Re: private network traffic and 3550"
• Previous message: Logan, Harold: "RE: Re[2]: arleady ccie's: **given an option for frame-relay"
• Maybe in reply to: Kip Palmer: "3550 no NAT?"
• Next in thread: kym blair: "RE: 3550 no NAT?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yeah, I hear you.

I can also do a >sh ip nat [keyword] ...successfullyy

But,... go to global and try to key anything relative to the service.

No worky!...............????

Maybe a diff keyword? (global)

Kip Palmer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Kip Palmer
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 10:22 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: 3550 no NAT?

-Back me up on this; The 3550 EMI does NOT do NAT.

==That's a question==

Thanks in advance,

Kip Palmer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

• Next message: Tom Larus: "Re: private network traffic and 3550"
• Previous message: Logan, Harold: "RE: Re[2]: arleady ccie's: **given an option for frame-relay"
• Maybe in reply to: Kip Palmer: "3550 no NAT?"
• Next in thread: kym blair: "RE: 3550 no NAT?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:25 GMT-3