RE: DLSW

From: Voss, David (dvoss@heidrick.com)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 11:25:09 GMT-3

• Next message: Hunt Lee: "Frame-relay mystery"
• Previous message: Amer Mdanat (amdanat): "RE: HSRP question"
• Maybe in reply to: Bobby: "DLSW"
• Next in thread: 劉博仁: "RE: DLSW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

fyi... my mistake on that last... llc2 = dlsw lite

from what I understand, fst and direct support token ring only, therefore
tcp and dlsw lite are the only 2 still required on lab scenarios.

tcp
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1

dlsw lite
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0 102
frame-relay map llc2 102 broadcast

-----Original Message-----
From: Voss, David [mailto:dvoss@heidrick.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:21 PM
To: 'Bobby'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW

you are using direct encap which requires an llc2 mapping

frame-relay map llc2 102 broadcast

be sure to do it on both sides of the virtual circuit

-----Original Message-----
From: Bobby [mailto:bobby1@ctimail3.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 7:57 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW

Hi,

I am unable to connect two DLSW peers using the direct encapsulation.
Here is the config

dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0 102
frame-relay map dlsw 102 broadcast

Whether my above config is ok ?

Thanks

• Next message: Hunt Lee: "Frame-relay mystery"
• Previous message: Amer Mdanat (amdanat): "RE: HSRP question"
• Maybe in reply to: Bobby: "DLSW"
• Next in thread: 劉博仁: "RE: DLSW"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:24 GMT-3