From: Jerry (phase90@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Feb 15 2003 - 21:44:40 GMT-3
Hello Jeff and group,
You lost me here as I have no lab to check configs. Do the 2
routers' ATM adapters form an
SVC between the respective PVCs? He's asking if SVCs can be done. I don't
get it from the example - 2 PVCs.
Jerry
----- Original Message -----
From: Jeff Kesemeyer <jkesemey@bellsouth.net>
To: 'Ong Boon Hui' <ongbh@cet.st.com.sg>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 6:51 PM
Subject: RE: SVC for bridge 1483
> Here you go:
>
> R13
> interface ATM0
> ip address 172.16.1.13 255.255.255.0
> pvc 0/113
> bridge-group 1
> no shutdown
> bridge 1 protocol IEEE
>
> R14
> interface ATM0
> ip address 172.16.1.14 255.255.255.0
> pvc 2/114
> bridge-group 1
> no shutdown
> bridge 1 protocol IEEE
>
>
> Jeff Kesemeyer
> CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE
> www.bradshawlabs.com
> "Your CCIE Rack Rental Source"
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ong Boon Hui
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:23 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: SVC for bridge 1483
>
>
> Hi Group,
>
> Does anyone have got configurations on CISCO routers with ATM
> configuration with bridge 1483 and using SVCs ? Is this possible ?
>
> Rgds,
> Debarros
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:24 GMT-3