From: Hunt Lee (huntl@webcentral.com.au)
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 04:05:42 GMT-3
Hi Jim,
To answer your first question, the "promiscuous" keyword will need to be
explicitly defined with the local-peer statement.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Regards,
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: ccie2be [mailto:ccie2be@nyc.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, 14 February 2003 2:08 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: DLSW --- On-Demand Peers and Promiscuous
Hi,
When a peer is part of a group eg. "Dlsw local-peer peer-id x.x.x.x group
yy"
is it implicitly promiscuous or does promiscuous have to be explicitly
added?
And, if you need to change the defaults for such a peer, which command
should
be used, the
dlsw peer-on-demand-defaults
or the
dlsw prom-peer-defaults
It seems to me that a peer in a dlsw peer group is both an "On-demand" and
"Promiscusous" peer in which case either command should work.
Having only one PC in my lab, is there any way to test this?
Thanks, Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:22 GMT-3