From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Feb 14 2003 - 08:54:01 GMT-3
Thanks for replying to this question. But, if, as you say, the
"promiscuous" keyword must be explicitly added, doesn't that make this peer
both a POD and promiscuous peer in which case, either command, (dlsw
peer-on-demand or dlsw prom-peer-defaults) to change the defaults should
work?
Is there any way to test this with only 1 PC connected to my lab of routers?
Jim
----- Original Message -----
From: "freewilly free" <freewilly2002@rediffmail.com>
To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
Cc: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: DLSW --- On-Demand Peers and Promiscuous
> Hi Jim,
> Promiscous shud be explicitly added.
> dlsw peer-on-demand-defaults should be used to change the default
> values for POD peers.
>
> Bye
>
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 ccie2be wrote :
> >Hi,
> >
> >When a peer is part of a group eg. "Dlsw local-peer peer-id
> >x.x.x.x group yy"
> >is it implicitly promiscuous or does promiscuous have to be
> >explicitly added?
> >
> >And, if you need to change the defaults for such a peer, which
> >command should
> >be used, the
> >
> >dlsw peer-on-demand-defaults
> >
> >or the
> >
> >dlsw prom-peer-defaults
> >
> >It seems to me that a peer in a dlsw peer group is both an
> >"On-demand" and
> >"Promiscusous" peer in which case either command should work.
> >
> >Having only one PC in my lab, is there any way to test this?
> >
> >Thanks, Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:22 GMT-3