From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Sat Feb 08 2003 - 20:54:49 GMT-3
At 05:57 PM 2/8/2003 -0500, sam wrote:
>I would say that as long as it has NOT been explicitly removed, there's
>fair game for having ISIS under any circumstances.
Of all the crap you are forced to study for this exam, IS-IS may prove to
me one of the more useful topics :-) It's a popular spin on link state
routing, and provides IGP services to many of the largest networks around.
Not too mention, for those who understand OSPF and routing concepts in
general, it is not a hard protocol to grasp. It's actually a lot simpler
in many respects and OSPF. So on or off the lab, it's likely something one
should look at anyway.
Pete
>Sam Sena
>
>Thanks
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Casey, Paul (6822)
>Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 1:12 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Possible OT IS-IS
>
>Do anyone know if it is possible to get be asked to configure IS-IS over
>the
>frame-relay network on the CCIE lab exam for routing and switching,
>based on
>what has been removed from the exam, I am unclear on this issue as I am
>not
>familiar enough with ISIS, though I seen some people say that it needs
>to
>use clns mapping or something to that effect, which has I think been
>removed,
>
>Any thoughts to clarify this would be appreciated.
>Kind regards.
>Paul.
>
>Sorry if this is OT.
>
>
>************************************************************************
>****************
>
>This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files
>transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and
>intended
>solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
>addressed.
>Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or
>copying
>of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
>received the E-mail in error please notify postmaster@O2.com or
> telephone ++ 353 1 6095000.
>
>************************************************************************
>*****************
>.
>.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:17 GMT-3