From: Logan, Harold (loganh@mccfl.edu)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 15:21:55 GMT-3
Don't leave out AD, split horizon, and route-maps.
My preference is to use a route map when redistributing to filter out the "problem" networks. Remember also that split horizon is disabled on natural frame intefaces. The only time
I use anything else is if route maps and/or split horizon are forbidden by the lab instructions.
Hal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stong, Ian C [GMG] [mailto:Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:33 AM
> To: Sunil Soporie; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Redistribution Loop avoiding, best way
>
>
> It depends on the protocols and what you are trying to do :) - but in
> general if it's a simple setup you can usually get by with
> metrics. In more
> complicated scenarios you will have to filter using things such as
> distribute lists, route maps and so forth. As for the tag
> parameter it's
> more for your information than for routing decisions. It
> allows you to
> assign a tag to routes that you redistribute from one
> protocol to another.
> That then gives you an idea when you are looking at routing
> tables where the
> routes came from.
>
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Ian
>
> http://www.ccie4u.com
> Rack Rentals and Lab Scenarios
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sunil Soporie [mailto:ssoporie@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:44 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Redistribution Loop avoiding, best way
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> 1)What is the best way to avoid redistribution loops if we are
> redistributing
> at two points in the network.
> 2)By just redistributing with metrics, are we good.
> 3)I have read cisco documentation and seen the usage of Tag
> parameter when
> redistributing into OSPF, how good is that.
>
> Any good links on CCO, will be a great help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sunil
> .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:12 GMT-3