From: jim.phillipo@guardent.com
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 11:55:08 GMT-3
This is what I did:
router eigrp 100
distance eigrp 90 90
seemed to work
-----Original Message-----
From: Hunt Lee [mailto:ciscoforme3@yahoo.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:19 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: CyscoExpert lab
Hi friends,
I have some questions about the configuration for Cyscoexpert Sample lab.
First: for question 2 under J
2. Double check R1, are you missing any routes?
I got this to work by increasing the Admin Dist. of OSPF route at R4 from R3
router ospf 1
distance 180 195.1.3.3 0.0.0.0 1
However, instead of doing this, if I tried to decrease the Admin Dist of
EIGRP route
from R2 (via Tunnel). It doesn't work.
I think it's because R2 actually got the route via OSPF as well, hence even
now
EIGRP has a lower Admin Dist than OSPF at R4, R2 would have no EIGRP route
(150.1.30.0/24) for distribute into R4.
Am I right?
Second: for question 3 under H.
3. Configure a DLSW+ session between R3 & R4 direct over the Frame-relay
network.
I think it has been done by:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 150.1.4.4
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 403
dlsw bridge-group 1
Am I right?
If so, is there any reason why I would need to use frame-relay map llc2 403
broadcast command? Is this command always required for DLSW Lite config?
Thanks so much for the help in advance,
Cheers,
Lee
http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- What's on at your local cinema?
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 11:06:10 GMT-3