From: OhioHondo (ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 19:23:33 GMT-3
I've seen many similiar comments on this problem.
I am curious about a BGP parameter that might relate to this.
In router config mode for the BGP process there is a command:
bgp client-to-client (for communication between route reflector clients)
does anyone have experience with this command?
what is its' special purpose?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Peter van Oene
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:50 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP sync with Route Reflector
At 12:30 PM 1/11/2003 +0700, Ali Fahmi wrote:
>Hi all, I have network topology like this
>
>
>R1
>| BGP 100
>| =======================================
>R2 ------------------------R3 (RR)
> |
> | BGP 200
>R4-------------------------- OSPF
>|
>| =======================================
>R5 BGP 300
>
This cannot be resolved without changing IGP's or removing IBGP. The sooner
Cisco stops testing on this (assuming by all the questions that they are)
the better.
>R3 use Frame Relay multipoint interface to R2 and R4
>
>
>Syncronization is enabled in all routers
>
>R1 originates network 200.1.1.0, when I injected into OSPF on R2, This
>routes will be reflected to R4 by R3, the problem is, in R4 200.1.1.0 is
>not marked as best-path, so R5 doesnt get that routes from R4
>I didn;t see "not syncronized" on R4, I just saw "no best path"
>
>I have already set ospf-ID same with bgp router ID, so what is suspected
>problem ??
>and how to solve this problem ??
>
>thx
>
>
>Ali
>===========================================================================
================
>Meriahkan Hari Valentine Anda dan Ikuti Lomba Desain Kartu Eletronik
>dengan Tema Valentine
>Ikuti Polling Pemilihan Pemenang Lomba Desain Kartu Elektronik Natal dan
>Tahun Baru 2003 di http://kartu.plasa.com/lomba
>KSI PlasaCom - Reuni Alumni STTTelkom
>http://www.plasa.com/belajar/reuni.html
>===========================================================================
================
>.
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:50 GMT-3