From: Jennifer Bellucci (Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 19:10:50 GMT-3
Hi
Everyone has their own way of doing things. The most reliable method I have
found for myself is to permit only the routes you want and don't let
anything be red un-controlled. That way, your ACL are nice and solid with
little time spent on exactly what you need to filter if any.
Try performing red and speed up the protocol lifetime - hello, keep, spf,
lsa, stuff like that. See what happens and you can see routing loops better
while using traceroute to do a nice check, you will find that sometimes you
can ping the address but the tracroute goes on till 32 or something.
Just a thought.
Jbell
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vijay S Jayaraman" <vjayaram@in.ibm.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:33 AM
Subject: Mutual redistribution
> Hi,
> In case I am doing a mutual redistribution at a single point between any
> two routing protocols , do I really ever need to filter the routes that
are
> being redistributed for prevention of a loop.....????????
>
> I have never done this and have had no problems till now..... But wouldnt
> want to discover something new during my lab.....
>
> But is there any case where filtering is required in for such a
> redistribution?....what is the normal thing to do??
>
>
> Regards,
> Vijay.
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:50 GMT-3