From: MMoniz (ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jan 15 2003 - 18:57:38 GMT-3
Well that would depend I would think. My thinking would be:
If there were routes being advertised by rip from R1 and you did not want
those propogated to
R4 via eigrp, then you would have to filter them. Same as if these were
eigrp routes from R4 that you did
not want advertised beyond R3.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
chris a
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 6:41 AM
To: Jonathan V Hays
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Mutual redistribution
Hi,
I have had many thoughts about this and with only 3 weeks to go until my
lab I am start to worry.
I have found in Karl Solie's CCIE practical studies on page 621 he states
the following.
R1----------------R2------------------R3-----------------R4
| ----- RIP version 1 ------------------|---EIGRP2001------|
When performing mutual redistribution on R3 becuace there is only one
redistribution point
there is no need to perform any route filtering when using mutual
redistribution.
Any thoughts anyone please.
Chris
>
> Hi,
> In case I am doing a mutual redistribution at a single point between any
> two routing protocols , do I really ever need to filter the routes that
> are being redistributed for prevention of a loop.....????????
>
> I have never done this and have had no problems till now..... But
> wouldnt want to discover something new during my lab.....
>
> But is there any case where filtering is required in for such a
> redistribution?....what is the normal thing to do??
>
>
> Regards,
> Vijay.
> .
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:50 GMT-3