From: Jung, Jin (jin.jung@lmco.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 13:18:56 GMT-3
I think if u put secondary address on r1 with /8 or /16 and put into eigrp
process,
This might work.
Jin Jung
Enterprise Information Services
Network Infrastructure engineer
Office: 301-640-3247
Have a great day
l
-----Original Message-----
From: Stong, Ian C [GMG] [mailto:Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 9:17 AM
To: Hunt Lee; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RE: RIPv1
What about using the various methods such as additional OSPF area and redist
on R3, subinterfaces between R3/R4 with /15 mask and so forth?
Ian
www.ccie4u.com
Rack Rentals
-----Original Message-----
From: Hunt Lee [mailto:huntl@webcentral.com.au]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:59 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: RIPv1
Hi,
I have the following lab scenarios:
R1 -------- R2 -------- R3 -------- R4
R1 & R2 on EIGRP
R2 & R3 on OSPF
R3 & R4 on RIPv1 (R3 is connecting to R4 with /24)
The requirement is:-
There is an /15 EIGRP route (131.11.0.0/15) in R1 that I needed to get into
R4. If I am not allowed to use "ip summary-address eigrp" on R1, nor using
OSPF "summary-address" on R2 & R3, nor using any "ip default-network" or
"static routes" on R4, is there any other way I can get R4 to be able to see
this network?
Thanks for your help.
H
.
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:49 GMT-3