From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Mon Jan 13 2003 - 01:33:10 GMT-3
I don't have a lab handy right now, but I'm guessing that the basic
implementation should be able to handle your proposed scenario. The stratum
of R2 is merely a sort of hop count from the master, and the stratum of R3
would depend on that of R2. When synchronization betwen R1 and R2 fails, the
stratum of R2 should go to infinity, and R3 should stop synchronizing with
R2. Or am I way, way off the mark here, guys?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sage Vadi" <sagevadi@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:42 AM
Subject: NTP: synchorinzation issue
> Hi all,
>
> R1---R2---R3
>
> R1 = NTP Master, R2 = NTP Peer, R3 = NTP Peer
>
> R2 peers with R1, R3 peers with R2
>
> Q) When synchornization failure occurs from R2 to R1,
> how do I make R3 stop from synchronizing with R2?
>
> NB: I thought this might have been doable with NTP
> Master, Server and Peer relationships, but alas I have
> been overly successful.
>
> Cheers,
> Sage
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:48 GMT-3