From: kym blair (kymblair@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 09:25:26 GMT-3
Howard,
We'd all like to see a comprehensive QOS chart.
Thanks,
Kym
>From: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
>Reply-To: "Jonathan V Hays" <jhays@jtan.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Small Minded QOS
>Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:17:53 -0500
>
>Howard,
>
>I, for one, would be quite interested in such a comparative table.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>
>Jonathan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Howard C. Berkowitz
>Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:47 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Small Minded QOS
>
>
>At 7:39 PM +0000 1/8/03, Jennifer Bellucci wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >Can someone tell me where I can find every single QOS formula for all
> >the QOS techniques in one document, prefer it if it was one page.
> >Please do not send me the link to QOS on cco.
>
>Could you clarify what you mean by "formula"? When I hear that, I
>think of the derivation of the algorithms, and, certainly for things
>like RED and WFQ, these were published in scientific papers of many
>pages and equations. Indeed, if you go into the literature, you'll
>find that what we may call things are actually approximations ("true"
>WFQ is a theoretical abstraction; what we call WFQ is more like
>Self-Clocked WFQ).
>
>Now, if you are thinking of a comparative table of what the various
>IOS QOS mechanisms do, that's something I might be able to dig up. .
>.
rd
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:46 GMT-3