From: martin vlahos (martin1997ca@yahoo.ca)
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 01:30:27 GMT-3
you can ask the proctor what they want you to do , but the question should not try to lead to any hint .
use ip sum eigrp x.x.x.x mask 255 , can remove the summary in local table but the neighbor will still receive it .
this is a topic about this before , sh ip route x.x.x.x , you can see the distance .
Solomon Ghebremariam <sghebrem@cisco.com> wrote: Elmer
I am a little confused here. You summarize it for a reason and why
do you want to remove the route to Null0 from the table? Can we achieve both?
Solomon
At 04:44 PM 1/7/2003 -0500, cebuano wrote:
>Aidan,
>Once again, thanks for redirecting my attention. This is the basis of my
>original post on CCO....
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_
>reference_chapter09186a00800917e8.html#1021694
>
>What I am worried about in the lab is my misinterpretation of
>words/phrases since English is NOT my native tongue. The URL above, to
>my understanding, says a summary address is NOT installed in the route
>table (i.e. if I do a "sh ip route" it should NOT be there).
>
>Anyone from non-English background with experience getting words/phrases
>clarified by the proctor? Were they helpful/snobby/etc...?
>
>Thank you all.
>Elmer
---------------------------------
Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:45 GMT-3