From: stefan vogt (stefan-uwe_vogt@web.de)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 17:03:08 GMT-3
Thanks to all who replied. Sorry for the missing subject line.
-Stefan
"OhioHondo" <ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com> schrieb am 07.01.03 18:23:52:
> Stefan
>
> Yes and No
>
> If you only want one interface in OSPF and it has the IP address 1.1.1.1
> then both commands will do the trick -- no functional difference.
>
> The 1.1.1.0/24 could place many interfaces into OSPF.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> stefan vogt
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:13 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: <no subject>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any functional difference between eg.
> network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
> and
> network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> when putting an interface into ospf?
>
> -Stefan
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> __
> Ent- oder weder? Nein! Wer den nicht kauft, der platzt vor Neid:
> M E D I O N - PC P4 2.4 kompl. nur 969,- http://www.mempag.de/xmas3.php
> .
> .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:44 GMT-3