From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 15:59:07 GMT-3
What bugs have you run into and what IOS version? Tags are pretty important
in what I do and bugs would be bad news indeed....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Desmond" <cciestudy@sympatico.ca>
To: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: mutual redistribution
> I prefer to use route-map. Tag has some bugs.
>
> Desmond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:41 AM
> Subject: Re: mutual redistribution
>
>
> > Nothing better than route tags...
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Azhar Mehmood" <azhar.mehmood@web.de>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:27 AM
> > Subject: mutual redistribution
> >
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > i'm bit confused wth redistribution, would be great if someone help me
> out
> > here.
> > >
> > > Scenario:
> > >
> > > RA---------------------------------RB
> > > | |
> > > | |
> > >
> R1---------------------------------R2---------------RE
> > > |
> > > |
> > > RC
> > >
> > > OSPF: R2 - RB - RA - R1
> > > EIGRP: R1 - R2 - RC
> > > RIP: RE - R2
> > >
> > > Redistribution:
> > >
> > > OSPF <-> EIGRP : R2 and R1
> > > RIP <-> OSPF : R2
> > > RIP <-> EIGRP : R2
> > >
> > > Now my question: What is the best way to handle such kind of
> > redistributions. I tried with TAGS. Anyone knows better soloutin? A
> > configuration example would be higly appreciated.
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > Azhar M.
> > > .
> > .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:44 GMT-3