From: OhioHondo (ohiohondo@columbus.rr.com)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 16:32:15 GMT-3
Here's three
If you have access to the interface(s) on the other side of the link, you
can make that interface passive.
Do not define the interface to RIP. If the interface is receiving RIP
updates from the other side of the link it will not do anything with them.
Define an ACL that does not allow any updates. (Deny any)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jay Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 1:54 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Blocking RIP Updates
Passive-interface on a RIP router only prevents the sending of updates,
but the router will still install routes learned via the passive
interface. Is this correct?
If so, how would one block RIP updates from a specific interface? Are
distribute-lists and interface ACLs both valid / common / only ways of
doing this?
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:44 GMT-3