Re: EIGRP Summary-address behavior

From: Sage Vadi (sagevadi@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 03:55:20 GMT-3


Aidan,

Locally on the ABR this is what it gets -

D 192.168.0.0/22 is a summary, 00:52:38, Null0

There is no indication of AD.

I'm going to test with another IOS.

Cheers,
Sage

 --- Aidan Marks <amarks@cisco.com> wrote: > At 05:11
PM 7/01/2003, Sage Vadi wrote:
>
> >Elmer/Cebuano,
> >
> >On my core router:
> >D 192.168.0.0/22 [90/2169856] via 116.16.37.2
> >
> >On my ABR I have configured:
> >ip summary-add eigrp 100 192.168.0.0 255.255.252.0
> 5
> >
> >A# To me it DOES seems that the core router learns
> the
> >summarization as a InternalEIGRP route with AD of
> 90.
> >
> >This is testing with 12.2(12.5)T, I can also test
> with
> >12.2(10b) if you like.
> >
> >Q) Anybody else know why? According to AD charts
> >summarized EIGRP routes = 5
>
> AD is local. If you look at the AD of the summary
> to null0 via show ip
> route it should be 5 i.e. "distance 5". The other
> router picks it up as
> just another EIGRP route (internal) and therefore
> gets AD 90 on the other
> router.
>
> Yes?
>
> Aidan
>
>
> >Cheers,
> >Sage
> >
> > --- cebuano <cebu2ccie@cox.net> wrote: > Hello.
> > > I'd like to know if the command "ip
> summary-address
> > > eigrp" as documented
> > > on CCO has changed. It is described under the
> > > command reference as
> > > follows.
> > >
> > > EIGRP summary routes are given an administrative
> > > distance value of 5.
> > > The administrative distance metric is used to
> > > advertise a summary
> > > without installing it in the routing table.
> > > But I'm getting two conflicting results.
> > > 1. I don't see the admin distance of 5.
> > > 2. I see the summary installed in the routing
> table.
> > >
> > > MC3810a(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp 2001
> > > 150.100.200.0
> > > 255.255.255.0
> > >
> > > MC3810a#ir
> > >
> > > 150.100.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 7
> > > subnets, 2 masks
> > > D 150.100.200.0/24 is a summary, 00:02:41,
> > > Null0
> > > C 150.100.200.0/30 is directly connected,
> > > Serial0
> > > D 150.100.100.0/24 [90/2681856] via
> > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:07,
> > > Serial0
> > > D EX 150.100.2.0/24 [170/2195456] via
> > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:07,
> > > Serial0
> > > C 150.100.3.0/24 is directly connected,
> > > Ethernet0
> > > D EX 150.100.1.0/24 [170/2195456] via
> > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:07,
> > > Serial0
> > > D 150.100.10.0/24 [90/2185984] via
> > > 150.100.200.1, 00:02:09,
> > > Serial0
> > >
> > > MC3810a#sh ip eigrp topo
> > > IP-EIGRP Topology Table for
> > > AS(2001)/ID(192.168.254.1)
> > >
> > > P 150.100.200.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2169856
> > > via Summary (2169856/0), Null0
> > > P 150.100.200.0/30, 1 successors, FD is 2169856
> > > via Connected, Serial0
> > > P 150.100.100.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2681856
> > > via 150.100.200.1 (2681856/2169856),
> > > Serial0
> > > P 150.100.2.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2195456
> > > via 150.100.200.1 (2195456/281600),
> Serial0
> > > P 150.100.3.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 281600
> > > via Connected, Ethernet0
> > > P 150.100.1.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2195456
> > > via 150.100.200.1 (2195456/281600),
> Serial0
> > > P 150.100.10.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2185984
> > > via 150.100.200.1 (2185984/176128),
> Serial0
> > >
> > > Any comments?
> > > Thanks.
> > > Elmer
> > > .
> > >
>
>__________________________________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a
> message
> > > to
> > > majordomo@groupstudy.com with the body
> containing:
> > > unsubscribe ccielab
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Everything you'll ever need on one web page
> >from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
> >http://uk.my.yahoo.com
> >.
> .
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:44 GMT-3