From: Desmond (cciestudy@sympatico.ca)
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 15:18:44 GMT-3
I prefer to use route-map. Tag has some bugs.
Desmond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Chang" <changjoe@earthlink.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: mutual redistribution
> Nothing better than route tags...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Azhar Mehmood" <azhar.mehmood@web.de>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:27 AM
> Subject: mutual redistribution
>
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > i'm bit confused wth redistribution, would be great if someone help me
out
> here.
> >
> > Scenario:
> >
> > RA---------------------------------RB
> > | |
> > | |
> >
R1---------------------------------R2---------------RE
> > |
> > |
> > RC
> >
> > OSPF: R2 - RB - RA - R1
> > EIGRP: R1 - R2 - RC
> > RIP: RE - R2
> >
> > Redistribution:
> >
> > OSPF <-> EIGRP : R2 and R1
> > RIP <-> OSPF : R2
> > RIP <-> EIGRP : R2
> >
> > Now my question: What is the best way to handle such kind of
> redistributions. I tried with TAGS. Anyone knows better soloutin? A
> configuration example would be higly appreciated.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Azhar M.
> > .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:43 GMT-3