From: Jennifer Bellucci (Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 03:30:17 GMT-3
Thanks, I already knew that, you will not believe how this trick helps in
red and tagging. solutions
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mahmud, Yasser" <YMahmud@Solutions.UK.ATT.com>
To: "'Michael Snyder'" <msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com>; "'Jennifer
Bellucci'" <Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:47 AM
Subject: RE: Null route without being null?
> One point you need to be careful of is:
> If you define a connected i/f under eigrp with wildcard of 0.0.0.0 then
for
> those subnet's no-auto summary doesn't work on that router
>
> Yasser
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Michael Snyder [SMTP:msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 3:29 PM
> > To: 'Jennifer Bellucci'
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: Null route without being null?
> >
> > >Ok, imagine if I asked you to make a null route without using a routing
> > >Protocol
> >
> > Sure, turn off auto-summary in eigrp, it will create null routes at the
> > classful boundaries.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Jennifer Bellucci
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 6:28 PM
> > To: Joerg Kohlenz; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Null route without being null?
> >
> > Ok, imagine if I asked you to make a null route without using a routing
> > protocol or static route, regardless if it makes sense, could you find a
> > solution?
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joerg Kohlenz" <j.kohlenz@itknetwork.com>
> > To: "'Jennifer Bellucci'" <Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:10 AM
> > Subject: AW: Null route without being null?
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > maybe they mean to do a default route .. but what is the sense of this
> > lab to do (also a default route to null makes not a lot of sense?)?
> >
> > maybe they say null and mean like "ip route 0.0.0.0 .0.0.0.0" ?
> >
> > bye,
> > joerg
> >
> > -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von
> > Jennifer Bellucci
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Januar 2003 00:34
> > An: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Betreff: Null route without being null?
> >
> > Hi people
> >
> > Can you tell me if it is possible to make a null0 route without using
> > the "IP
> > ROUTE X X NULL0" COMMAND. I do not want to know what protocols can
> > generate
> > this but how to generate it without using a protocol.
> >
> > If I was doing a lab where I am not allowed to use routing protocols and
> > not
> > allowed to use static routes, how do I generate a null0 route?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Jennifer Bellucci
> >
> > Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:42 GMT-3