From: Chuck Church (ccie8776@rochester.rr.com)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 15:13:14 GMT-3
Shadi,
If you've got more than 1 vlan on the 2950, you can modify the spanning
tree port costs on the trunks so vlan x is forwarding on trunk 1, but vlan y
is forwarding on trunk 2. If it's all 1 VLAN on the 2950, I suppose you
could split the switch into 2 vlans, with a non-trunk from each connecting
to a 6509, same vlan on the 6509 side. Interswitch traffic between VLANs
would need to pass over the 6509s then. I wouldn't recommend it, but it's
an option.
Chuck Church
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shadi" <ccie@investorsgrp.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:34 AM
Subject: Bandwidth Aggregration?
> Guys,
>
>
> I would like to ask about a design related issue,
>
> I have a 2950G-48 switch with two Gigabit fiber uplinks connected to two
> different 6509 switches, each uplink is connected to each 6509 switch and
> both switches 6509 are connected through Etherchannel 10Gbit. They are
> forming a triangle.
>
> I would like to aggregate the bandwidth between the two 2950G-48 Uplinks
up
> to 2 Gbps. So the switch 2950G-48, is connected to both switches with
2Gbit.
>
>
> How can I do that? Can Cisco Etherchannel support termination to one
chassis
> from aside (2950G) and to two different chassis's from another side (2x
> 6509).
>
> Any Ideas?
>
>
> Shadi
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:40 GMT-3