From: Jennifer Bellucci (Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 16:19:46 GMT-3
Hi
[Please do not respond to this question if you think it violates the NDA.]
I have been reading the posts for awhile know and got one question I need to
ask to all IE's.
I know a potential IE candidate should try and learn as much as she/he can. I
agree and have been using that rule in my studies but I was wondering, when
you have sat the lab (1-day only) have you been tested on everything (and I
mean almost everything in the IOS) on the lab or knowing about the other
technologies/methods made things more simple on how you approach the task?
While going through ccbootcamp and ipexpert labs, I have noticed that there is
not one lab I have come across that tries to nail everything in sight.
Ccbootcamp labs are by far the best testers I have come across when it comes
to routing and have recently introduced 3550 stuff. Ccbootcamp's lab 8 is
pretty good when it comes down to OSPF/BGP, red and few other things.
Lab 22 is also lab I liked, 25/26...I ran through those in 2 hours - just what
you need every morning.
Ipexpert's lab 30-35 are nice testers and give you a good hammering when it
comes to all the so called fringe topics and gives you a different approach
when it comes to configuring things.
Getting back to my question, if you have access to any of these products you
will notice there is no single lab that kills almost every subject. So, I am
guessing that the lab does not actually test you on "every" subject. That does
not mean there are subjects that will not appear its just that knowing the
most of the potential topics will help you. I could be wrong and they crucify
you on every imaginable topic.
Hopefully, I think you might have understood my question and will be able to
give me a good answer. (No abusive replies please)
Thanks
Jennifer Bellucci
Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:40 GMT-3