From: Liban.Mohamed@mail.sprint.com
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 14:32:20 GMT-3
Thanks Chang, It does make sense. But why does it work when running
static "no packet drop" But as soon as we turn the BGP session client
sees a packet drop. So we are sending equal traffic across the multilink
when running static and BGP.
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: changjoe [mailto:changjoe@earthlink.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 10:54 AM
To: ccielab
Subject: Re: PPP multilink.
BGP is a TCP-delivered protocol, so it probably woudln't interfere with
layer-2 functions such as MPPP.
How much traffic are you sending across the multilink before setting up
BGP
and then afterwards? Increased traffic across the multilink may be
exposing
problems that you wouldn't see otherwise.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Liban.Mohamed@mail.sprint.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: PPP multilink.
> Crew,
>
> I deleted by mistake chang e-mail I know he was asking me a question
> about the PPP multikink, I have a client that is running PPP
multilink
> and wants to start running BGP with an ISP. everytime we enable the
BGP
> we are seeing a packet drop. If we change to static everything is
going
> fine. Does PPP multilink support 8(T1)with BGP...
>
>
> Any inside scope..
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> .
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:39 GMT-3