From: Tim Fletcher (tim@fletchmail.net)
Date: Thu Jan 02 2003 - 18:03:05 GMT-3
Packets being dropped because of no route maybe?
I'm not sure I'm clear on your scenario, but it sounds like you're
comparing a default route to your provider versus BGP with your provider.
If this is the case, you may be missing routes, which would cause packet
drops. Try having your provider send you a default route.
-Tim Fletcher
At 12:32 PM 1/2/2003 -0500, Liban.Mohamed@mail.sprint.com wrote:
>Thanks Chang, It does make sense. But why does it work when running
>static "no packet drop" But as soon as we turn the BGP session client
>sees a packet drop. So we are sending equal traffic across the multilink
>when running static and BGP.
>
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: changjoe [mailto:changjoe@earthlink.net]
>Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 10:54 AM
>To: ccielab
>Subject: Re: PPP multilink.
>
>
>BGP is a TCP-delivered protocol, so it probably woudln't interfere with
>layer-2 functions such as MPPP.
>
>How much traffic are you sending across the multilink before setting up
>BGP
>and then afterwards? Increased traffic across the multilink may be
>exposing
>problems that you wouldn't see otherwise.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <Liban.Mohamed@mail.sprint.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 11:45 AM
>Subject: PPP multilink.
>
>
> > Crew,
> >
> > I deleted by mistake chang e-mail I know he was asking me a question
> > about the PPP multikink, I have a client that is running PPP
>multilink
> > and wants to start running BGP with an ISP. everytime we enable the
>BGP
> > we are seeing a packet drop. If we change to static everything is
>going
> > fine. Does PPP multilink support 8(T1)with BGP...
> >
> >
> > Any inside scope..
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > .
>.
>.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Feb 01 2003 - 07:33:39 GMT-3