Re: DLSW Bit Swapping

From: Aidan Marks (amarks@cisco.com)
Date: Mon Dec 30 2002 - 20:54:15 GMT-3


...and therefore dlsw icanreach statements should be entered in
non-canonical format. dlsw ethernet redundancy commands must be entered in
canonical notation.

At 10:27 AM 31/12/2002, Tony Schaffran wrote:

>When DLSW+ receives data from an Ethernet interface, it swaps the bits for
>transport. When it gets to the destination, if it is Token Ring, it leaves
>the bits swapped and passes on. If the destination is Ethernet, it swaps
>the bits back and then forwards.
>
>I hope that did not confuse you any more than it did me. :)
>
>
>
>Tony Schaffran
>Network Analyst
>CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
>NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
>
>CCOnlineLabs.com
>http://www.cconlinelabs.com
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Scott Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 2:58 PM
>Subject: DLSW Bit Swapping
>
>
> > My understanding is that when using DLSw in a pure Ethernet (No TR)
> > environment you do NOT need to do any bit-swapping. Would that be a
> > consensus on this forum?
> >
> > Thank You,
> > Scott
> > .
>.
.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:55 GMT-3