From: Tony Schaffran (tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com)
Date: Mon Dec 30 2002 - 20:56:02 GMT-3
Thank you for adding that.
Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
CCOnlineLabs.com
http://www.cconlinelabs.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aidan Marks" <amarks@cisco.com>
To: "Tony Schaffran" <tschaffran@cconlinelabs.com>
Cc: "Scott Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: DLSW Bit Swapping
> ...and therefore dlsw icanreach statements should be entered in
> non-canonical format. dlsw ethernet redundancy commands must be entered
in
> canonical notation.
>
> At 10:27 AM 31/12/2002, Tony Schaffran wrote:
>
> >When DLSW+ receives data from an Ethernet interface, it swaps the bits
for
> >transport. When it gets to the destination, if it is Token Ring, it
leaves
> >the bits swapped and passes on. If the destination is Ethernet, it swaps
> >the bits back and then forwards.
> >
> >I hope that did not confuse you any more than it did me. :)
> >
> >
> >
> >Tony Schaffran
> >Network Analyst
> >CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> >NNCSS, NNCDS, CNE, MCSE
> >
> >CCOnlineLabs.com
> >http://www.cconlinelabs.com
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Scott Livingston" <scottl@sprinthosting.net>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 2:58 PM
> >Subject: DLSW Bit Swapping
> >
> >
> > > My understanding is that when using DLSw in a pure Ethernet (No TR)
> > > environment you do NOT need to do any bit-swapping. Would that be a
> > > consensus on this forum?
> > >
> > > Thank You,
> > > Scott
> > > .
> >.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:55 GMT-3