Re: ospf area range

From: kym blair (kymblair@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 23 2002 - 00:39:05 GMT-3

• Next message: Cliff Moseley: "Re: distribute-lists"
• Previous message: ccie_studying: "RIP2 and OSPF redistribution"
• Maybe in reply to: Ansar Mohideen: "ospf area range"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Tom,

The /26 is correct because you are not black-holing as much address space
(just .1-.15 and .48-.63 rather than .1-.15 and .48-.255).

HTH, Kym

>From: Thomas Stuart <tastuart@comcast.net>
>Reply-To: Thomas Stuart <tastuart@comcast.net>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: ospf area range
>Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:45:50 -0500
>
>when performing ospf summarization and using the "area x range" command,
>which of the following statements is correct??
>
>they both worked!!
>
>137.20.1.17 /28
>
>137.20.1.33 /28
>
>area 11 range 137.20.1.0 255.255.255.0
>
>or
>
>area 11 range 137.20.1.0 255.255.255.192
>
>again, they both worked, and i just walked-out the comman bit pattern!!
>
>thank's
>
>tom
>.

• Next message: Cliff Moseley: "Re: distribute-lists"
• Previous message: ccie_studying: "RIP2 and OSPF redistribution"
• Maybe in reply to: Ansar Mohideen: "ospf area range"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:51 GMT-3