From: Chris Home (clarson52@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Dec 21 2002 - 03:25:56 GMT-3
We all have access to Cisco for everything else to so why ask any questions
here?
But I see your point and why you might interpret it that way. It doean't
really matter anyway.
It get's old seeing all this violating the NDA stuff. I have never seen
anyone say I had such and such on my CCIE exam (not that it hasn't happened
here). In my opinoin anything other then saying something like that is not a
violation but then it doesn't really matter what I think when it comes to
the NDA or what anyone else might think for that matter.
It is not up to anyone on this list what violates the NDA. It is up to
Cisco. If a quesion bothers someone that much then why not just report it to
Cisco and let them decide. It certainly does no good to continously see
accusations, warnings and such on the list when what violates the NDA and
what doesn't isn't up to the list and it doesn't mean a whole lot unless
Cisco says there was a violation.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <groupstudy@comcast.net>
To: "'Chris Home'" <clarson52@comcast.net>; "'Rajashekar'"
<rraja@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:01 PM
Subject: RE: Reg New CCIE lab
> Yes, but since we ALL have access to the changes listed on the Cisco web
> site, why ask THAT question here. That's why I interpret the question
> as trying to solicit a more detailed description based on collective
> experience of the members of this list, and that would indeed be a
> violation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Chris Home
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:06 PM
> To: Joe; 'Rajashekar'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Reg New CCIE lab
>
>
> Not really.
>
> Some of the changes are that Token-ring is gone, the CAT5000 was
> replaced with 2 Cat 3550's, I think they took out IPX as well. There are
> others. If you look through the CCIE lab info on CCO you should find
> some info on the changes
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe" <groupstudy@comcast.net>
> To: "'Rajashekar'" <rraja@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 8:20 PM
> Subject: RE: Reg New CCIE lab
>
>
> > I think the answer to this one would violate the NDA, don't you
> > think??????????????????????????
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of Rajashekar
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:41 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Reg New CCIE lab
> >
> >
> > Since the New Lab exam from November 4th, I would like to know the
> > changes that have happened to the CCIE LAB exam as compared to earlier
>
> > one.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raj
> > .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:50 GMT-3