Re: Eigrp Security

From: Joe Chang (changjoe@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Dec 13 2002 - 18:49:52 GMT-3

• Next message: ccieingroup@hotmail.com: "Fw: OSPF virtual link"
• Previous message: Scott Page: "RE: ATM SVC/PVC"
• Maybe in reply to: Colin McNamara: "Eigrp Security"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Do distribute lists block EIGRP lost-route queries?

> Use distribute list
>
> Iftikhar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Chang [mailto:changjoe@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:04 PM
> To: Groupstudy
> Subject: Re: Eigrp Security
>
>
> > Is there a way to ensure that Eigrp does not sent updates or requests =
> > out an interface without using the passive command ?
>
> Just curious, why would you need to do something like that?
> Yours is actually a pretty good question. The passive command disables
> updates only. If you lose a route, queries are still going to be sent out
> that interface.
> .
> .
.

• Next message: ccieingroup@hotmail.com: "Fw: OSPF virtual link"
• Previous message: Scott Page: "RE: ATM SVC/PVC"
• Maybe in reply to: Colin McNamara: "Eigrp Security"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:45 GMT-3