From: Tran Tien Phong (PhongTT2@FPT.COM.VN)
Date: Tue Dec 10 2002 - 02:02:02 GMT-3
I think if you do not specify an access-list, the new AD will be applied to all routes learned by that protocols in local router (not the whole routing domain). These routes will show the new AD in the local routing but in other routers in the routing domain, these routes will show the default AD.
Pls correct me if I'm wrong
-----Original Message-----
From: Surjamukhi Chatterjea [mailto:surchatt@cisco.com]
Sent: Tue 12/10/2002 2:03 AM
To: 'Cristian Henry H'; 'Prio Utomo'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Distance Question
Somebody correct me if I am wrong on the syntax, but I think one neat
feature
is that the distance command can be applied to specific routes using ACLs:
RouterA# router ospf 1
distance 95 10.1.0.1 255.255.255.0 50
access-list 50 perm 172.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
On RouterA, the route for network 192.168.3.0 announced by
10.1.0.1 will turn up with AD 95.
Best
Surja
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Cristian Henry H
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:57 AM
To: Prio Utomo
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Distance Question
Just in the router
Prio Utomo wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> What is the scope of AD changes made by distance command? does it change
the
> whole routing domain AD or just in the router?
>
> Regards,
> Prio
> .
--
Cristian E. Henry
REUNA
E-mail: chenry@reuna.cl
Fono: 56-2-3370336
.
.
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:42 GMT-3