From: Matthew Poole (matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 14:33:13 GMT-3
I just tried secondary interfaces!
When I turn off split horizon it works.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/41.pdf
Any ideas which is preferred method? Tunnels, secondary or something else??
Mat.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal Kurz" <halkurz@hotmail.com>
To: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@cox.net>; "Matthew Poole"
<matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
> Why wouldn't you use the secondary addresses directly on the interface, if
> that is the case?
>
> I have not had luck in the use of secondary addresses in classful
protocols.
> I have used multiple tunnels (I thought to the same endpoints). I will
> review my notes and lab configs.
>
> Again, I would like to hear other suggestions on this matter.
>
> Hal
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@cox.net>
> To: "Hal Kurz" <halkurz@hotmail.com>; "Matthew Poole"
> <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:44 AM
> Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
>
>
> > One additional suggestion:
> >
> > Rather than creating one tunnel per mask, use a single tunnel with
> secondary
> > addresses. Multiple tunnels can be hard to keep track of. Plus, two
> > tunnels cannot have the same endpoints.
> >
> > MY 2 cents.
> >
> > Bob Sinclair
> > CCIE #10427
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Hal Kurz" <halkurz@hotmail.com>
> > To: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>;
> > <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:16 AM
> > Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
> >
> >
> > > I used tunnels as suggested in another email on this list from earlier
> > this
> > > year. If you create a tunnel for each of the different subnet masks
that
> > RIP
> > > is not picking up, the tunnel will carry those routes between the
> > > redistribution router and RIP v1.
> > >
> > > Anyone else have a suggestion there or care to comment on the use of
> > > tunnels?
> > >
> > > Hal
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Innovative Technology Consultants and Company, Inc.
> > > 11767 South Dixie Highway #307
> > > Miami, FL 33156
> > >
> > > Office: (305) 235-6587
> > > Fax: (305) 256-1562
> > >
> > > www.itccinc.com
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:08 AM
> > > Subject: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
> > >
> > >
> > > > Exercise 2, Page 739 - OSPF to RIPv1.
> > > >
> > > > The only way I can get this to work is change the mask on RB E1 to
/28
> > (as
> > > > in part 1.), although the solution clearly states no need!
> > > >
> > > > N.B. RB E1 is my S1/1
> > > > RB E0 is my S1/0
> > > >
> > > > The ints on the left are loopbacks with IP OSPF NETWORK
PONT_TO_POINT
> > > >
> > > > RB routing table -
> > > > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > > >
> > > > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 masks
> > > > O 172.16.1.160/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
> Serial1/0
> > > > C 172.16.1.144/28 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > > > O 172.16.1.128/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
> Serial1/0
> > > > R 172.16.2.128/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:16, Serial1/1
> > > > O 172.16.1.224/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
> Serial1/0
> > > > O 172.16.1.192/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
> Serial1/0
> > > > R 172.16.2.32/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> > > > S 172.16.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > > > C 172.16.1.96/27 is directly connected, Serial1/1
> > > > R 172.16.2.64/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > A Debug IP Rip on RB shows :
> > > >
> > > > 03:43:24: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial1/1
> > > > (172.16.1.97)
> > > > 03:43:24: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
> > > >
> > > > Relevant config on B is :
> > > >
> > > > interface Serial1/0
> > > > ip address 172.16.1.146 255.255.255.240
> > > > clockrate 128000
> > > > !
> > > > interface Serial1/1
> > > > ip address 172.16.1.97 255.255.255.224
> > > > clockrate 128000
> > > >
> > > > router ospf 1
> > > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > > redistribute rip metric 1000000 subnets
> > > > passive-interface S1/1
> > > > network 172.16.1.146 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > > !
> > > > router rip
> > > > redistribute ospf 1 metric 2
> > > > passive-interface S1/0
> > > > network 172.16.0.0
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > > .
> > > .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3