From: Hal Kurz (halkurz@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 14:22:17 GMT-3
Why wouldn't you use the secondary addresses directly on the interface, if
that is the case?
I have not had luck in the use of secondary addresses in classful protocols.
I have used multiple tunnels (I thought to the same endpoints). I will
review my notes and lab configs.
Again, I would like to hear other suggestions on this matter.
Hal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Sinclair" <bsin@cox.net>
To: "Hal Kurz" <halkurz@hotmail.com>; "Matthew Poole"
<matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
> One additional suggestion:
>
> Rather than creating one tunnel per mask, use a single tunnel with
secondary
> addresses. Multiple tunnels can be hard to keep track of. Plus, two
> tunnels cannot have the same endpoints.
>
> MY 2 cents.
>
> Bob Sinclair
> CCIE #10427
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hal Kurz" <halkurz@hotmail.com>
> To: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
>
>
> > I used tunnels as suggested in another email on this list from earlier
> this
> > year. If you create a tunnel for each of the different subnet masks that
> RIP
> > is not picking up, the tunnel will carry those routes between the
> > redistribution router and RIP v1.
> >
> > Anyone else have a suggestion there or care to comment on the use of
> > tunnels?
> >
> > Hal
> >
> >
> >
> > Innovative Technology Consultants and Company, Inc.
> > 11767 South Dixie Highway #307
> > Miami, FL 33156
> >
> > Office: (305) 235-6587
> > Fax: (305) 256-1562
> >
> > www.itccinc.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matthew Poole" <matthew.poole@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:08 AM
> > Subject: Route Redistribution - Doyle config exercise
> >
> >
> > > Exercise 2, Page 739 - OSPF to RIPv1.
> > >
> > > The only way I can get this to work is change the mask on RB E1 to /28
> (as
> > > in part 1.), although the solution clearly states no need!
> > >
> > > N.B. RB E1 is my S1/1
> > > RB E0 is my S1/0
> > >
> > > The ints on the left are loopbacks with IP OSPF NETWORK PONT_TO_POINT
> > >
> > > RB routing table -
> > > Gateway of last resort is not set
> > >
> > > 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 10 subnets, 3 masks
> > > O 172.16.1.160/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
Serial1/0
> > > C 172.16.1.144/28 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > > O 172.16.1.128/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
Serial1/0
> > > R 172.16.2.128/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:16, Serial1/1
> > > O 172.16.1.224/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
Serial1/0
> > > O 172.16.1.192/28 [110/782] via 172.16.1.145, 00:41:32,
Serial1/0
> > > R 172.16.2.32/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> > > S 172.16.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1/0
> > > C 172.16.1.96/27 is directly connected, Serial1/1
> > > R 172.16.2.64/27 [120/1] via 172.16.1.98, 00:00:17, Serial1/1
> > >
> > >
> > > A Debug IP Rip on RB shows :
> > >
> > > 03:43:24: RIP: sending v1 update to 255.255.255.255 via Serial1/1
> > > (172.16.1.97)
> > > 03:43:24: RIP: build update entries - suppressing null update
> > >
> > > Relevant config on B is :
> > >
> > > interface Serial1/0
> > > ip address 172.16.1.146 255.255.255.240
> > > clockrate 128000
> > > !
> > > interface Serial1/1
> > > ip address 172.16.1.97 255.255.255.224
> > > clockrate 128000
> > >
> > > router ospf 1
> > > log-adjacency-changes
> > > redistribute rip metric 1000000 subnets
> > > passive-interface S1/1
> > > network 172.16.1.146 0.0.0.0 area 0
> > > !
> > > router rip
> > > redistribute ospf 1 metric 2
> > > passive-interface S1/0
> > > network 172.16.0.0
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > > .
> > .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:41 GMT-3