From: Corbin, Kevin (Kevin.Corbin@LibertyMutual.com)
Date: Fri Dec 06 2002 - 12:42:17 GMT-3
I think you would have to use point-to-point subinterfaces and configure each of them in the bridge group, then the router would treat them as different interfaces and I don't believe that you would have this issue. I have not done this with FR, but I have done a similar config with ATM subinterfaces.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Chessin [mailto:nchessin@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 2:03 AM
To: 'Hoang Duc Phuong'
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Bridge over Frame Relay
I guess you run into a problem when you broadcast. If you think about it, when a switch (bridge) receives a packet that it doesn't know the destination, it broadcast out all ports, except the one the it was learned on.
In a hub and spoke environment, if what I am thinking is correct, won't broadcast a packet out of a the interface it learned it through, even though they are on different PVC's.
I don't really have any crazy configs, just thinking conceptually and wondering how this will affect bridging.
Nate
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Hoang Duc Phuong
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:33 PM
> To: Nathan Chessin
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Bridge over Frame Relay
>
>
> Could you post your configuration !
> In my opinion ! You can bridge like bridging over IP network ... right
> ?
>
> Phuong
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nathan Chessin" <nchessin@cisco.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:22 PM
> Subject: Bridge over Frame Relay
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am having trouble bridging over Frame Relay. Can somone
> explain the
> > issues related to bridging over Frame in a hub and spoke
> environment. For
> > example, does the hub have to be the root, etc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > Nate
> > .
> .
.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:39 GMT-3