From: Mahmud, Yasser (YMahmud@Solutions.UK.ATT.com)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 11:15:01 GMT-3
> Hi,
> Just wanted check if I'm missing something.
> The question seems wrong to me
>
> If 2 hosts want to communicate they have to send explorers to create the
> circuit.
> How is the below possible without explorers??
>
> Thks
> Yasser
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI) [SMTP:mm1343@sbc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 6:20 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: DLSW ICANREACH/ICANTREACH in a pure Ethernet Environment
>
> Hello,
> I'm not sure this post will make it to the group since I have had trouble
> in
> the past but here it goes:
>
> If one were presented with the following requirement:
> "Config R4 to peer to R2. Ensure that R2 never sends explorers for
> 4000.4000.4000 which is the only resource available through R4"
> R2 and R4 are Ethernet only. My question is this- If I choose to configure
> a
> DLSW ICANREACH statement on R4 to satisfy this requirement, should the
> command be :
> dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive
> dlsw icanreach mac-address 0200.0200.0200 mask ffff.ffff.ffff
> or
> dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive
> dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.4000.4000 mask ffff.ffff.ffff
> In other words, do I need to bit-swap in an Ethernet only environment?
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> Martin Molina
> Senior Network Engineer
> SBC (Pacific Bell) Internet Services
> CCNP CCDP
> desk: (925) 973-7774
> cell: (925) 216-5299
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:38 GMT-3