From: Tom Young (gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp)
Date: Tue Dec 03 2002 - 22:05:36 GMT-3
DOn't need change any of the MAC address, the router will
do the non-canonical or canonical changing according of
the port type, ether or TR.
--- "MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI)" <mm1343@sbc.com> $B$+$i$N%a(B
$B%C%;!<%8!'(B
> Thanks for the lead.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. Warren [mailto:chwarren@cox.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 2:28 PM
> To: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI); 'Warren Chuck Contr
> JCIET/J6';
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: DLSW ICANREACH/ICANTREACH in a pure
> Ethernet Environment
>
>
> MAC's are non-canonical for the icanreach
> statements......was using the
>
> link as a guide to lead you to the answer.....
>
>
>
> Chuck, CCIE #10653
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>
> > Behalf Of MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI)
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 3:22 PM
>
> > To: 'Warren Chuck Contr JCIET/J6';
> 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>
> > Subject: RE: DLSW ICANREACH/ICANTREACH in a pure
> Ethernet Environment
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I've seen this example before but unfortunately
> the router
>
> > they use in the example is a Token Ring router
> that has a
>
> > dlsw icanreach statement configured for a FEP on
> the Token
>
> > network. I'm wondering if hosts on an Ethernet
> network need
>
> > their mac bit-swapped. Thank you for your reply
> just the same !
>
> >
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Warren Chuck Contr JCIET/J6
> [mailto:charles.warren@eglin.af.mil]
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 11:55 AM
>
> > To: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI);
> 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>
> > Subject: RE: DLSW ICANREACH/ICANTREACH in a pure
> Ethernet Environment
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I think you'll find your answer in this link:
>
> >
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/dlswfilter.shtml#macfilter1
>
>
<http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/dlswfilter.shtml#macfilter1>
>
>
>
>
> Chuck, CCIE #10653
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: MOLINA, MARTIN J (PBI) [
> mailto:mm1343@sbc.com
>
> <mailto:mm1343@sbc.com> ]
>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 12:20 PM
>
> > To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>
> > Subject: DLSW ICANREACH/ICANTREACH in a pure
> Ethernet Environment
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I'm not sure this post will make it to the group
> since I have
>
> > had trouble in
>
> > the past but here it goes:
>
> >
>
> > If one were presented with the following
> requirement:
>
> > "Config R4 to peer to R2. Ensure that R2 never
> sends explorers for
>
> > 4000.4000.4000 which is the only resource
> available through R4"
>
> > R2 and R4 are Ethernet only. My question is this-
> If I choose
>
> > to configure a
>
> > DLSW ICANREACH statement on R4 to satisfy this
> requirement, should the
>
>
>
> > command be :
>
> > dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive
>
> > dlsw icanreach mac-address 0200.0200.0200 mask
> ffff.ffff.ffff
>
> > or
>
> > dlsw icanreach mac-exclusive
>
> > dlsw icanreach mac-address 4000.4000.4000 mask
> ffff.ffff.ffff
>
> > In other words, do I need to bit-swap in an
> Ethernet only environment?
>
>
>
> > Thanks in advance
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Martin Molina
>
> > Senior Network Engineer
>
> > SBC (Pacific Bell) Internet Services
>
> > CCNP CCDP
>
> > desk: (925) 973-7774
>
> > cell: (925) 216-5299
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 17:21:38 GMT-3