From: Abdallah Al-Suwailem (aalsuwailem@myrealbox.com)
Date: Fri Nov 29 2002 - 14:49:04 GMT-3
That is right, if you see "redistribute rip" and "distribute-list 1 out
rip" think of it as distribute-list for the redistribution protocol,
what it is the source of the redistribution, it is "RIP", then it is out
from the RIP toward ospf. Check this link
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/34.html#out
Abdallah
stefan vogt wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I think
>
>router ospf 109
> ...
> distribute-list 11 out rip
>
>access-list 11 permit 130.10.8.0 0.0.7.255
>access-list 11 deny 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
>
>
>means permit only route 130.10.8.0 255.255.248.0 coming from rip to be redistributed into ospf.
>
>Pls. correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>Stefan
>
>"Emmanuel Guilain" <emmanuel.guilain@cgey.com> schrieb am 29.11.02 17:22:58:
>
>
>>Hello
>>
>>I'm having problems reading this document:
>>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs001.htm#xtocid57174
>>
>>Especially with the access-lists 10 and 11 in the routerA configuration.
>>
>>For me,when filtering redistribution from OSPF to RIP you have to prevent
>>routes learned from RIP into OSPF to return into the RIP domain. And the
>>following lines seems to permit only these routes:
>>router ospf 109
>>distribute-list 11 out rip # this means "filters the routes distributed out
>>to RIP" right? Or Am I this wrong?
>>access-list 11 permit 130.10.8.0 0.0.7.255
>>access-list 11 deny 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
>>
>>If you want only the RIP routes to be advertised in OSPF you have to filter
>>everything but these routes.
>>And the access-list 10 does the opposite.
>>
>>Please, can you tell me where I'm wrong?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Emmanuel Guilain
>>
>>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________________
>Keinen passenden Spruch f|r die SMS parat? Mit WEB.DE FreeMail
>kein Problem mehr! http://freemail.web.de/features?mc=021149
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:12 GMT-3