From: Wright, Jeremy (JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 15:23:49 GMT-3
i am receiving numerous duplicate old emails from the list. thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Banlan Chen [mailto:banlan.chen@lycos.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:14 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'; Wright, Jeremy
Subject: Re: multipoint frame w/ospf best practices
Hi,
Cause p-t-mp subint's default ospf network type is non-broadcast (you can
use sh ip ospf int to verify it), so you need use network statement to
indicate the net type is p-t-mp. Although you can make them in full status
when one side is p-t-mp and another side is non-broadcast, the routing table
is wrong. Wish it could be helpful.
Banlan
--On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 17:41:35 Wright, Jeremy wrote: >i have a standard hub and spoke topology with the hub being frame >multipoint. one spoke is a frame physical interface and the other spoke is a >p-t-p sub. since the hub comes up as a point to multipoint interface as far >as ospf goes (i do have IARP turned off and frame maps to each spoke on hub >and also on the physical spoke pointing to other spoke and the hub) and i >make each spoke an ip ospf network p-t-mp. everything is up, frame and ospf, >but the solution says to use the ip ospf network p-t-mp on the hub also. i >really dont see the need for this since the frame multipoint comes up >automatically as a p-t-mp. i know i should nail down everything i can >statically, but am i really gaining anything in this situation? Thanks! >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 07:23:11 GMT-3